Use case

Prioritize bugs by the customers they hit

Bug trackers rank by event count. Vesqo ranks by the paying customers behind each issue and the revenue at stake, so the fix that matters to the business is the one at the top, and the one that matters to nobody who pays waits its turn.

The problem

A small team cannot fix everything this week. The queue is ordered by whatever the error tracker counts: events, users, first seen. None of those is what the founder wants it ordered by, which is what the bug costs. A crash on a free-plan feature with a thousand events outranks a silent failure that stops your largest customer's admin from exporting invoices.

The workaround is a spreadsheet: issue, users, plan, MRR. It is right for a day.

What Vesqo does

Every issue Vesqo sees is set beside the accounts it hit and what they pay. A regression signal says which customers are in it and the MRR at stake; the morning brief orders the day's signals by that money, across every product in the workspace.

The severity is not the count. A rise in errors on a meaningful count after a release is a signal; the same rise with two paying customers inside it and a failed payment from each is a critical one, delivered the minute it is written.

When the order is decided, an automation opens the issue in Linear, Jira or GitHub with the write-up in it: the release, the customers, the money, the suggested first step. Nobody rewrites the ticket.

Example

Questions it answers

  • Which open issues hit customers who pay more than €200 a month?
  • Which bug this week cost the most in failed payments?
  • Is this issue hitting anyone who pays?
  • What should we fix first?

See what it finds in a workspace with a bad afternoon in it.

The demo is Farol Jobs, a made-up job board with a bad release in it, every screen open. Ask it anything. Then connect your own.

Vesqo would like to count visits with Google Analytics. Google's cookies are set only if you say yes, and the site is the same either way. Cookie notice